Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Goodbye, Premiere Magazine

VARIETY: Premiere folds
Magazine will continue online
By STEVEN ZEITCHIK
Posted: Mon., Mar. 5, 2007, 4:21pm PT

Hachette Filipacchi pulled the plug on Premiere on Monday, confirming widespread rumors that the embattled movie mag would be shuttered.

Many of the company's editorial staffers will leave the company, including editor-in-chief Peter Herbst.

The April issue, which features Will Ferrell on the cover for "Blades of Glory," will be mag's last. Staffers put the issue to bed about 10 days ago.

Premiere publisher Paul Turcotte could be named to another post within Hachette, though there was no official confirmation of a new role.

Magazine, published 10 times per year, will continue to exist online.

Specifics on how many staffers would migrate, how often content will be refreshed and how many of the mag's regular features will be maintained were undisclosed.

News of its print demise brings to an end what has been something of a media soap opera for the New York-based title, which employs five print editorial staffers in its Hollywood bureau and an estimated couple dozen in its flagship Gotham offices.

Hachette and parent company Lagardere were trying to sell the title earlier this year, but bidders were reportedly thin for the troubled pub. Mag saw its ad pages decline nearly 25% in 2006.

Announcement marks the closure of another pub for Hachette, which also shuttered Elle Girl and startup Shock.

The 20-year-old Premiere had its heyday in the 1990s, when the appetite for insider movie news grew.

Even today, mag publishes a Hollywood power list and industry scuttlebutt under sections like "Yes It's True: News You're Not Supposed to Know," alongside more consumer-friendly stories, such as a list of overrated movies.

But the trade-flavored pieces in which Premiere once specialized have become less relevant as consumer dailies have taken more of an interest in the biz, while sites like Defamer have proliferated to satisfy the demand for near-instantaneous industry gossip.

Premiere also faced the challenge of being a long-lead mag in a realm where news moves increasingly quickly. For example, Oscar predictions made months in advance now run the risk of becoming stale by the time the print edition hits newsstands.

And while interest in celeb news is by many indications stronger than ever, sites like TMZ and PerezHilton have proved more adept at breaking and keeping up with news.

Hachette's latest strategy is to move in a newsier direction, offering more timely items on Premiere.com and mobile platforms -- routes that would also be less costly.

"This step is consistent with our strategy to examine our portfolio of brands to determine the best business plan for each, based on its category and the marketplace," Hachette prexy-CEO Jack Kliger said in a statement.

Company will continue publishing international editions in territories such as France, where the mag started in the 1970s.

*************************************************************************************

I'm sorry to see Premiere go - I bought the first issue when it came out (The "Dragnet" film was on the cover), and subscribed for several years. I have to say, though, I think the magazine was best in its first incarnation - as a magazine for film buffs. Later, it evolved into an industry magazine, and I got disenchanted with its "power issues" - listing the 100 most powerful people in the industry, and so forth. These days, I sometimes read Sight And Sound - it's a pretty expensive subscription and a challenging read, but much more rewarding.

Labels: , , , , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger mnmears said...

I subscribed for the first couple of years ... and I really liked the miniature movie poster cards that used to be included inside.

Can't say I'll miss it -- especially since there are so many more outlets from daily newspapers to Web sites and blogs devoted to film.

I also really marveled at the early editions of Cinefex ... some of the insider articles were a bit difficult to digest technically ... but they were also fascinating.

It seems like nearly most every film special effect done today is CGI.

11:23 PM  
Blogger Jeff Pidgeon said...

I really liked the miniature movie poster cards that used to be included inside.

Yeah! That was cool. It wasn't a fanzine, but it seemed more for film nerds initially, as opposed to the industry-insider tone it developed later.

I liked Cinefex too, but the processes were a bit over my head when I was reading. It definitely got a lot less interesting when most effects problems were solved on the computer.

11:39 PM  
Blogger Anita said...

Ah premiere! I LOVED that magazine! For awhile it was part of my Big Three; Entertainment weekly (the everyman magazine), Movieline (the bitchy one!), and Premiere (which always seemed the most legit). I always felt "in the know" about what was coming out in film.

Then Movieline became "hollywood life" and lost it's teeth. Premiere became a fluff mag and a poor man's Variety. I gave up on 'em.

Now, only EW remains. But, just for the articles.

12:14 PM  
Blogger Vessy said...

I do not know why it is OVER, nut my heart is totally broken. This is the best movie issue. NOW WHAT???????
Is there an explanation why this happened????????
Please, send me publications and links referring to this nightmare!

Vessy
Sofia-Bulgaria

7:34 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wikio