Who Is Number Six?
Doubtless you've heard that there's a feature-film adaptation being developed of the cult television show The Prisoner. Who knows how you can take something so idiosyncratic and transform it into a new story that doesn't cling too tightly to the past, or fixate too much on the present? But I do feel pretty certain about one thing. I really, really want Kevin McKidd to play Number Six.If you don't know him, he did a terrific job as the character Lucious Vorenus on the short-lived HBO series Rome. There's a certain degree of physical resemblance, but I think what makes McKidd so appropriate is that his role on Rome shares a powerful sense of righteousness with McGoohan's creation. Lucious is taken to a place in the story where he feels that he has nothing to lose or live for, and I think that brought him within a stone's throw of the distrustful, acerbic Number Six.
McGoohan was so extreme with the character that your alliance with him was not so much based on sympathy as it was a sense of agreement, a desire to share or believe in his certainty of right and wrong. McKidd's performance gives me confidence that he could bring more sympathy and emotion to the role, to give Number Six's strident qualities some warmth.
Maybe the film'll never happen, and I'm sure Universal and the filmmakers have plenty of ideas on who will don the black blazer. Still, I had to get this off my chest, just in case someone who has a say in things is reading... you just never know.
Be seeing you.
Labels: casting, film, kevin mckidd, number six, patrick mcgoohan, rome, television to film, the prisoner
3 Comments:
I too loved him in "Rome"(who couldn't?)...and he would make a great 6.
Do you remember him from "Topsy Turvy"? To think he can sing, too! And plays comedy so well...boy, if I'd gone into acting the place to be would be in the UK--so many opportunites and actors that are so, so good--especially for such a tiny place. Here it's all about camera work, if you know what I mean. Guys like McKidd probably wouldn't get cast in an important role in a million years.
I don't remember McKidd from Topsy Turvy - I think I liked the film, but I saw it soon after it was released on DVD, and haven't seen it again since.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'important' roles - I'd be tempted to think that British actors get better, more substantial work here - or at least more prestigious work more often. Still, I imagine it's best for those who can turn the accent on and off at will, and be able to do Howard's End AND Transformers!
Ha--well, by "important" I meant star casting...flavor of the month, glitzy casting. Russell Crowe is an example--he also happens to be a great screen presence and an often brilliant actor(IMHO). An example of the other sort of deal that UK actors oten get here in the US is the kinds of people who do stage work constantly in england and are all over the BBC and ITV, CHannel 4 etc but are unknown here to the execs who greenlight casting. If the actor's young enough and handsome enough he might have a chance of breaking through, but to really "make it" you have to be cast in big budget things here. Not saying I agree with that at all--quite the opposite.
Post a Comment
<< Home