Sunday, May 25, 2008

Blogging: A Cautionary Tale (Excerpts)

"Back in 2006, when I was 24, my life was cozy and safe. I had just been promoted to associate editor at the publishing house where I’d been working since I graduated from college, and I was living with my boyfriend, Henry, and two cats in a grubby but spacious two-bedroom apartment in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. I spent most of my free time sitting with Henry in our cheery yellow living room on our stained Ikea couch, watching TV. And almost every day I updated my year-old blog, Emily Magazine, to let a few hundred people know what I was reading and watching and thinking about...

...The anecdotes I posted on Emily Magazine occasionally featured Henry, whom my readers knew as a lovably bumbling character, a bassist in a fledgling noise-rock band who said unexpectedly insightful things about the contestants on “Project Runway” and then wondered aloud whether we had any snacks. I didn’t write about him often, but when I did, I’d quote his best jokes or tell stories about vacationing with his family.

Henry, seemingly alone among our generation, went out of his way to keep his online presence minimal. Now that we’ve broken up, I appreciate this about him — it’s pretty much impossible to torture myself by Google-stalking him. But back then, what this meant was that he was never particularly thrilled to be written about. Sometimes he was enraged.

Once, I made fun of Henry for referring to “Project Runway” as “Project Gayway.” He worried that “people” — the shadowy, semi-imaginary people who read my blog and didn’t know Henry well enough to know that he wasn’t a homophobe — would be offended. He insisted that I take down the offending post and watched as I sat at my desk in our bedroom, slowly, grudgingly making the keystrokes necessary to delete what I’d written. As I sat there staring into the screen at the reflection of Henry standing behind me, I burst into tears. And then we were pacing, screaming at each other, through every room of our apartment, facing off with wild eyes and clenched jaws...

...As Henry and I fought, I kept coming back to the idea that I had a right to say whatever I wanted. I don’t think I understood then that I could be right about being free to express myself but wrong about my right to make that self-expression public in a permanent way. I described my feelings in the language of empowerment: I was being creative, and Henry wanted to shut me up. His point of view was just as extreme: I wasn’t generously sharing my thoughts; I was compulsively seeking gratification from strangers at the expense of the feelings of someone I actually knew and loved. I told him that writing, especially writing about myself and my surroundings, was a fundamental part of my personality, and that if he wanted to remain in my life, he would need to reconcile himself to being part of the world I described.

After a standoff, he conceded that I should be allowed to put the post back up. As he sulked in the other room, I retyped what I’d written, feeling vindicated but slightly queasy for reasons I didn’t quite understand yet."

Photo by Elinor Carucci.

To read the rest of Emily Gould's NY Times Magazine article, click here.

Labels: , , , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Jenny Lerew said...

I read this this morning in the magazine. What were your thoughts on it, Jeff?

It left me feeling a bit nonplussed. I was for a time a pretty regular reader of Gawker(probably just before and during some of her "editorship") even though not living/working in NY I had to fill in the blanks for myself where all the in-jokes and local references were concerned...but there was often some unbeatably good dirt dished there-always most enjoyable when focused on the truly pretentious and posing. Sometimes it was just nasty.

But this article-her "morning after" essay on that period of her life-seemed bizarrely naive given the totally brutal style of Gawker and the fact that even a 24 year old should know better than to think she could manage to keep secret a separate "personal" blog--with (as she writes)a hundred readers! Strange.
The overriding thing I got was that it made me want to read this "evil" thing her onetime boyfriend wrote about her(it sounded like it must have been really, really awful). And also to wonder what lessons she learned when here she is again, writing all about extremely personal and somewhat humiliating stuff for an even wider audience than Gawker ever gets...it's all so odd.

7:34 PM  
Blogger Jeff Pidgeon said...

Articles, skits or film clips where people wind up exposing more of themselves than they intend (or want, i.e, The Office,) make me pretty uncomfortable. They usually make me ask myself, "Have I done this already without even knowing it?" So that was my big take-away.

I think people often get seduced by the disconnection of the internet, especially under a pseudonym (though I don't think that she specifically used one). Maybe it was naive, but it seems believable to me that at 24, she might not have thought this stuff through as carefully as she might have needed to.

Unfortunately, that type of snarky blogging usually only works if you're really, really low-profile and not very many people care.

In her case, she wound up raising her visibility by the very writing she felt liberated/compelled to do under the radar. The spotlight begins to swing in her direction, which seemed to create a kind of a feedback loop (or at least a taste of the her own medicine). This blogging-fame happens a lot more now, like it did to Harry Knowles.

She does seem to touch on a realization in this article that she has a potentially harmful compulsion (at best).

I'm not sure how much she's learned, but it doesn't sound like she's blogging anymore. Writing the article about past exposure is a little different, but I know what you mean. Wouldn't she be more motivated to leave the whole thing behind her at this point? Apparently not.

My blog has never been nearly as snarky as many out there, but I've been turning it down anyway. I felt like I couldn't do it as well as blogs who make it their specialty, and I didn't want to regret something I wrote with a disconnection, and then meet the person(s) later on.

It's the main reason I very seldom use an internet alias myself.

12:28 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home