Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Toy OTD: Gentle Giant Clash Of The Titans Statue: Bubo (2007)

Nostalgia does strange things to people. I've never been a huge fan of Ray Harryhausen's last movie, Clash of the Titans (though it does have it moments), nor was I particularly enamored with Bubo, Perseus' mechanical sidekick/comedy relief. Yet when Gentle Giant announced a limited-edition resin Bubo statue, I was interested! I'm not sure how that works, unless you consider my long-running affection for robots.

Regardless of the sanity involved in purchasing a quasi-obscure character from a quasi-obscure '80s fantasy film, Gentle Giant did a terrific job here. The sculpt, paint work, metallic finish and branch perch all feel straight from the movie!

Since an open-winged pose would have been harder to manufacture and ship, Bubo's pose is fairly minimal here. Considering he's a mechanical character, it still feels appropriate. The head is a separate piece, which allows for a little extra pose variety.

The branch display stand is great - not only in helping to set the scene, but it's also subdued enough to support the character, not distract from him. Of course, the lack of branding is always appreciated!

The packaging is also really strong - the original film logo is used, and the new graphics are well art-directed to match to the tone and feel of the poster art. The back panel gets a little busy with text, but in general the box has great shelf presence. Rather than using a cellophane window, GG decided to use photos of the finished maquette. It still gives an accurate view of the product while integrating nicely with the new box art. You can see another side of the box here.

There were only five hundred of these statues made, so the edition is long sold out. Collectors can expect to pay between $150-$200 for Bubo on the secondary market. I paid $200 for mine at a toy show, but there might be one selling for $179.99 + shipping at Razor's Edge Collectibles (via kaboodle.com). Happy hunting!

Two post scripts. First: be careful looking up "Bubo" on Google Image Search. Two words: Bubonic Plague. Second: Mattel had originally planned to make a Bubo puppet-like toy back in the day, but poor response to the merchandising led to production being canceled. Wild!

Some images from gentlegiantcollectors.com and plaidstallions.com.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 06, 2009

John Hughes, 1950 - 2009

VARIETY: Director John Hughes dies at 59 - by Pat Saperstein

"John Hughes, who captured the zeitgeist of 1980s teen life as writer-director of The Breakfast Club and Sixteen Candles and produced and scripted family hits such as Home Alone, died Thursday of a heart attack in Manhattan while taking a walk. He was 59.

After an impressive string of hits -- Home Alone is one of the top-grossing live-action comedies of all time -- Hughes, who never won a major show business award, stopped directing in 1991 and virtually retired from filmmaking a few years later, working on his farm in northern Illinois."

Posted using ShareThis

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 12, 2009

Sweet! MINDstyle Pours On The Coolness: Black Hole Figures!

Well, "Black Hole figure" for the time being, but hopefully things will continue on down the character line if V.I.N.C.E.N.T. sells well. Can't wait!

I'm a big robot nerd, so I have a soft spot in my heart for these guys... especially old B.O.B. I sure hope he's next on the production line!

Article and images courtesy of Disney Consumer Group and I LIKE TOYS. Check out the link for more pictures, including a paint test!

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Toy OTD: Medicom Star Wars Kubrick Figures: Max Rebo

In general, I much prefer Kubricks to the many other mini-figures that are now flooding the market. They were one of the first out of the gate, they're well designed and constructed - and you don't have to buy expensive construction sets to get them (like Lego mini-figs).

This is a nice example of what makes Kubrick figures so neat - it's just a great distillation of the character (though some are even more boiled down to their essence)! I really like breaking a design down to the fewest elements and seeing how far you can go and still get the jist of it across. Plus... well, they're just cute!

Max here was part of a larger Star Wars set that included few of the other band members. Unfortunately, it's been out for a while, so it'll cost you $275 big ones to get it from eBay complete and mint in the box (MIB)! Other sites go as high as $300 (before they sold out), so this set will take some serious cash or patience. Happy hunting!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 05, 2008

Remake OTD: Short Circuit

"Dimension Films is rewiring 'Short Circuit,' acquiring rights to remake the 1986 film.

S.S. Wilson and Brent Maddock, who created the characters and wrote both 'Short Circuit' films, have been hired to write the remake. David Foster and Ryan E. Heppe will produce with John Hyde."
Read the rest of the article here.

***************************************************************************************

Wow, the eighties are back with a vengeance! I guess 'Saturn 3' will be next.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Where Is John Hughes?

"JOHN HUGHES hasn't set foot in Hollywood for years, but his influence has never been more potent. The king of 1980s comedy, Hughes now qualifies as something of a Howard Hughes-style recluse -- he doesn't have an agent, doesn't give interviews and lives far away, somewhere in Chicago's sprawling North Shore suburbs where most of his films were set."
I'm not the biggest fan of his films, but this is an interesting article. Read the rest of it here.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 15, 2007

A Christmas Story House Open For Tours

You'll be happy to know that the house where A Christmas Story was filmed looks exactly as it did in the classic 80's holiday film. But it wasn't easy...

Apparently, after the film's release, the original owners re-modeled everything in order to keep fans away. It didn't work. Fortunately, the next owner (Brian Jones, who snapped it up from eBay in 2004) was a huge Story buff, spending almost a quarter of a million to faithfully return the house to its original look. The house sports the iconic leg lamp in the front window, and a 1937 Oldsmobile in the driveway! Across the street is a Christmas Story museum where you can pick up souvenirs.

Check out the nerdy, nerdy details at achristmasstoryhouse.com.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 10, 2007

More On The Latest Version Of Blade Runner

SFFMEDIA.COM: What's new in Blade Runner: The Final Cut?
Written by John Howell - Sunday, 09 December 2007

After 25 years since its original release, a definitive version of Ridley Scott's science fiction masterwork Blade Runner, Blade Runner: The Final Cut, has arrived.

So what exactly has changed? And is it worth all the fuss?

After attending a recent screening I can report that there are significant differences, mainly improvements, between this new version and Ridley's first Director's Cut released in 1992.

First off, the unicorn dream sequence, originally introduced in the Director's Cut, has been extended. Deckard's daydream of a unicorn galloping through a forest in slow motion is a pivotal scene, clearly suggesting that Deckard, like Rachel, is a replicant. In a recent article in Wired, Ridley explained why.

“Gaff, at the end, doesn't like Deckard, and we don't really know why,” said Ridley, after being asked whether it was on paper that Deckard was a replicant. “And if you take for granted for a moment that, let's say, Deckard is Nexus 7, he probably has an unknown life span and therefore is starting to get awfully human. Gaff, just at the very end, leaves a piece of origami, which is a piece of silver paper you might find in a cigarette packet. And it's of a unicorn, right? So, the unicorn that's used in Deckard's daydream tells me that Deckard wouldn't normally talk about such a thing to anyone. If Gaff knew about that, it's Gaff's message to say, ‘I've basically read your file, mate.’”

Physically, Blade Runner has been altered to take advantage of the latest improvements in film and audio technology. The quality of the print and the audio has been significantly enhanced. A new digital print of the film was created from the original negatives, while the special effects were updated and polished. Special effects footage was scanned in at 8,000 lines per frame, which is four times the resolution used in most restorations. The dystopic Los Angeles landscape of 2019 is now more stunning than ever before. Watching flames leap skywards as a spinner flies through the darkness during the opening sequence is mesmerising.

Vangelis’ evocative soundtrack, remastered for The Final Cut in 5.1 Dolby Digital surround sound, sounds better than ever, complimenting the story perfectly, from the fast paced action sequences to the slow, haunting scenes in Deckard’s smoke filled apartment.

One of the most powerful aspects of Blade Runner is its bleak depiction of a dark decaying world lost in drizzle and shadow. The multicultural inhabitants struggle through busy city streets, but reside in almost empty skyscrapers, abandoned by the majority lucky enough to have left for better lives off world.

Rachel's hair has been recut and restyled. Extra footage and alterations enhance this compelling vision, including an extra shot of a crowded city street, a brief sequence of two exotic dancers wearing hockey masks, and a shot of Deckard meeting a policeman before he enters the Snake Pit.

There's also new footage of Zhora crashing through a display case after being pursued by Deckard. This scene was reshot. The original actress, Joanna Cassidy, performed the stunt herself, replacing original footage of an obvious stunt double.

Roy Batty’s death scene, where a dove is released into a bright blue sky, supposedly at night, now shows the dove flying into a night sky, with an appropriate bleak backdrop.

Some scenes, such as Deckard's first meeting with Gaff in the noodle bar, have been trimmed, as they ran too long after the removal of Deckard's voice over from the original theatrical release.

Various pieces of dialogue too have been inserted or altered. In an early scene, where Bryant and Deckard are looking over Nexus 6 profiles, Bryant now describes Leon’s job, and when he talks about replicants being caught in an electrical field, the dialogue has been changed from: "One of them got fried running though an electrical field" to "Two of them got fried running through an electrical field". This alteration fixes the problem of a sixth replicant unaccounted for in earlier versions.

In the scene where Batty confronts Tyrell, the line, "I want more life, fucker" has been replaced with "I want more life, father”. In the same scene, after Batty has killed Tyrell, he now says to Sebastian, "I'm sorry Sebastian. Come. Come."

Deckard’s conversation with a snake merchant has been rerecorded and reworked. In the 1992 Director’s Cut the dialogue is completely out of sync, making it very distracting.

Other additions include extra violence. All of the violent scenes in the International Cut that were deleted in the U.S. theatrical release have been reinserted, most unsettlingly when Roy Batty crushes Tyrell's head in his hands, gouging out his eyes. Pris's shocking and sad death scene, her arms and legs thrashing about wildly, also appears to be have been extended. Presumably censorship is not as restrictive as it had been when the film was originally released. Personally I think they could have left the level of gore as it was.

With so many previous versions, you could be forgiven for thinking that Blade Runner: The Final Cut is not worth much of our time. Some may argue that Ridley is merely tweaking a film that has already been tweaked well beyond its use by date. There’s some support for this given that Ridley Scott was quoted at the Venice Film Festival recently claiming that the science fiction genre is as dead as the western.

“There’s nothing original,” he said. “We’ve seen it all before. Been there. Done it”.

Perhaps that’s why, instead of creating a completely new science fiction film, he has merely retouched an old one.

He's a replicant you fool!You could of course hold an even more cynical view: this latest version is nothing more than a commercial exercise. Are Warner Bros. and Ridley Scott merely trying to squeeze the last drops out of loyal fans who should know better?

After viewing Blade Runner: The Final Cut in all its enhanced glory, I’d have to disagree. This is not just a patch up job attempting to cash in on a cult film. Like an oil painter retouching a masterpiece, or a novelist polishing prose, Ridley is trying to complete his vision. The film has been improved markedly using all the time, technology, and feedback Ridley had at his disposal. In an article for in New York Times, Ridley stated that he had “never paid quite so much attention to a movie, ever.”

That’s not to say that it’s flawless. Detectives in the future, for example, appear to lack some basic common sense: when Bryant shows Deckard profiles of the Nexus 6 replicants, it’s clear they know exactly what they all look like. So why didn’t Holden, whom we see in an early scene giving a Voight-Kamff test to Leon, already know that Leon was a replicant? Didn’t anyone give him the mug shots?

Equally, if Deckard really is a Nexus 7 created to work as an exterminator, why is he lacking the strength of the inferior Nexus 6 models he is chasing? He seems to spend a large part of the film being bashed to a pulp.

Flaws aside, Blade Runner: The Final Cut is a science fiction masterwork. There’s a reason Blade Runner has stood the test of time. Check it out in the theatre if you get the chance. It has a very limited release. The Blade Runner Ultimate Collector's Edition, which includes all previous versions of the film, is due out 18 December.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 12, 2007

Remake OTD: C.H.U.D.

DREAD CENTRAL UPDATE: Zombie to Redo C.H.U.D.!
Submitted by Johnny Butane on Wed, 11/07/2007 - 4:25pm.

This just in! Spoke with Rob and he confirmed he WILL be helming the C.H.U.D. remake!

Now this would be just plain weird ... But kinda cool at the same time.

Billboard.com just posted an article about Rob Zombie’s upcoming projects, everything from a White Zombie box set to the special edition of Halloween, and made mention in passing that the rocker cum director is attached to a remake of C.H.U.D..

Whoa now, what? Why? I mean, the original is a classic in its own right and a remake sure wouldn’t hurt, but why would Zombie tackle it? Billboard didn’t get confirmation from Zombie if that is his next film or not, so we’ll put this one in the “rumors” box for now.

Keep checking back; we’ll give you more when we know it!

- Johnny Butane

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Remake OTD: Child's Play

FIRST SHOWING.NET: Child's Play Remake in the Works
October 20, 2007 - by Alex Billington

While talking with David Kirschner this weekend, one of the producers of the upcoming John Cusack film Martian Child, he revealed that they are working on another Child's Play sequel, but it would instead be a remake of the first Child's Play. Don't jump the gun and complain about another remake just yet, you need to here all of the details - because this could be good. The film is only "in the works" at the moment with a story being put together but Kirschner claimed it would definitely be "more terrifying".

First things first, David Kirschner is the producer behind all five of the currently released Child's Play movies. He produced the first one and even the latest one, Seed of Chucky. Secondly, he also said that the same screenwriter who came up with the original Chucky story, Don Mancini, and who wrote all five of them is working on this one as well.

There is no director attached yet, as they're still working on the story, but some interesting discussion arose around what director might be chosen for this. Kirschner went on to explain that it would be very close to the original script, with some twists that the audience won't see coming. Sound like it could possibly be good yet?

Now just imagine a lot of the same things coming together with this that the first film had. Although Child's Play only has a 6.0/10 on IMDb, it is a cult classic in terms of horror movies and I know there a lot of big Chucky fans out there (including myself - that is, at least up to the third Child's Play). So just imagine - you have the same screenwriter and nearly the same script and you get someone like Darren Lynn Bousman, Rob Zombie, David Slade, Mikael Håfström, Christophe Gans, or even Takashi Miike to direct the remake. Now that would be awesome!

Something similar to this exact idea just happened - Rob Zombie's Halloween. Kirschner even mentioned it when one of the members of the press questioned whether a remake is a good idea at this time. Not everyone liked the Halloween remake, but I know people that did. And if you think of putting Child's Play in the hands of one of the new generation's up-and-coming horror directors, we could have a great film in the works.

*************************************************************************************

I couldn't even finish the first 'Child's Play'. I know horror films are supposed to be, you know, horrible, but it just came across to me as incredibly mean-spirited and repellant. A remake? None for me, thanks!

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Remakes OTD: Fright Night, Near Dark

SHOCKTILLYOUDROP: Screen Gems De-Fangs Fright Night?
Source: Ryan Rotten - September 18, 2007

"You have to have FAITH for that to work...Misssster Vinccccent, remember?" spits vampire Jerry Dandrige in the face of a holy cross held by Peter Vincent in Tom Holland's Fright Night. And, for this rabid "Night" fan, faith is something I've held onto during these dark days of Hollywood remakes. Faith that the Fright Night property would go untouched. Un-"remade."

Screw that.

ShockTillYouDrop.com discovered Sony's Screen Gems is sifting through Hollywood's supply of writers for a Fright Night redo. But this one, from the sounds of it, is "in name only." A sundry of sources tell us executive producer Scott Strauss who may or may not still be attached and who recently shepherded Breach, starring Ryan Phillippe, and executive produced Robert Englund's Killer Pad, wants to take Fright Night in a different direction. One involving an amusement park in some way.

Our immediate thought is "They're remaking Tobe Hooper's Funhouse and calling it Fright Night." We haven't heard a peep yet regarding how Gems is coming along with the pitch process, but we'll keep you in the loop!


BLOODY-DISGUSTING: Near Dark Remake News
Monday, September 17, 2007


Bloody-Disgusting has been scooped that Samuel Bayer will in fact helm Rogue Pictures' Near Dark remake for Platinum Dunes. Bayer directed music videos for The Smashing Pumpkins, Metallica, Green Day, Garbage and many others. Matt Venne wrote the screenplay that follows a young man who reluctantly joins a travelling "family" of evil vampires, when the girl he'd tried to seduce is part of that group. This will be the next film from Platinum Dunes, which is headed by Brad Fuller and Andrew Form.

Labels: , , , ,

Wikio