Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Help! Comes to DVD - Widescreen At Last!

Yes, you can finally get Richard Lester's Help! without having to watch it cropped, or needing to own a laserdisc player. The title came out yesterday as a two-disc set, garnished with interviews and documentaries. Sadly, there's no commentary, but it's widescreen, and I'll bet the transfer is a big improvement from the last release! That's exciting, because I think it's a really sharp-looking movie.

I agree with most folks that A Hard Day's Night is a lot better, but Help! is still a lot of fun, even if the Beatles were starting to lose interest in the whole movie-making thing at the time. Directing four guys frequently stoned on pot can't be fun (not to mention having to come up with another story), but I think it turned out pretty well! You can pick it up at Amazon.com for $16.95 + shipping.

PS - After seeing it for the first time, I always wanted to live in the four-house-wide flat that the guys live in at the beginning. Sunken floors are super-cool!

UPDATE: There's a great breakdown of the differences between this DVD release and the previous one at whatgoeson.com. Thanks to Bob Scott for the tip!

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Aimee Mann on Sgt. Pepper's

NY TIMES OP-ED: P.S. I Loved You
By AIMEE MANN
Published: June 3, 2007

MY big brother was always the one to bring new music into the house. Until I heard the Beatles playing on his stereo in the basement, my favorite music had been Glen Campbell singing “Galveston” or my father playing “Won’t You Come Home, Bill Bailey” on the piano.

I was young enough to giggle when my brother changed the words of “P.S. I Love You” to...something more puerile, and four years later, young enough to think that “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” was really a band, and not the name of a Beatles record. In those intervening years, a transformation had taken place, and both the sound and the look of the Beatles had completely changed. Also, I was a little slow on the uptake, and didn’t notice the name “Beatles” spelled out in flowers on the cover.

Is it a testament to the quality, or purity, or beauty, or timelessness of that record (released 40 years ago this weekend) that it appealed so thoroughly to an 8-year-old, one who had virtually no contact with pop culture? I could not have been more out of tune with the zeitgeist — it would be two more years before I discovered radio, and even then I would have only the vaguest notion of what was out there. I bought my first LP solely on the basis of the cover (one of the reasons today I try to take extra care with the packaging of my CDs). It was pure dumb luck that it turned out to be Elton John’s “Madman Across the Water,” still one of my favorite albums of all time.

But the favorite is, and was, and must remain “Sgt. Pepper’s.” I had a love affair like no other with that record. My brother had bought it, of course, and when I heard it, I braved his wrath and smuggled it out to my friend’s house so I could play it over and over. You’d have had to know my brother back then to fully understand how daring that was.

In a way, that record seemed made for children: the fun false mustaches that came with the package, the bright shiny outfits, the cheery melodies, the jaunty horns. The band itself seemed almost irrelevant — scruffy mustachioed men in costumes, lost in a sea of collaged faces. I ignored them.

My ignorance extended to the opening song, which I took at face value as a real live introduction of the singer Billy Shears, who, whoever he was, became my favorite, with his dopey baritone, in humble gratitude for his pals — bless them, it all was so innocent, those marmalade skies and winking meter maids (whatever they were). The darkest moments were with the runaway girl — although a throwaway line in “Getting Better” (“I was cruel to my woman, I beat her...”) gave me pause. He beat her? What the heck? But hey — things were getting better all the time, so ... I shrugged and let it go.

And then things took a weird turn: a nightmare cacophony of strings, someone blowing his mind out in a car — what was that? Did he get shot in the head? What were the holes in Albert Hall? Things had gotten creepy and dark, and it lost me. I started skipping that last song.

I can’t listen to “Sgt. Pepper’s” anymore. As a musician, I’m burnt out on it — its influence has been so vast and profound. As a lyricist, I find that my ear has become more attuned to the likes of Fiona Apple and Elliot Smith, and though the words of “Sgt. Pepper’s” are full of vivid images — Rita’s bag slung over her shoulder, Mr. Kite sailing through a hogshead of fire, the runaway girl with her handkerchief — there’s an emotional depth that’s missing. I’m ashamed to say it, but sometimes John Lennon’s melodies feel a bit underwritten, while Paul McCartney’s relentless cheerfulness is depressing. The very jauntiness I used to love as a girl feels as if it’s covering up a sadder subtext. And what’s bleaker than a brave face?

The whole experience is uncomfortable, like realizing you can beat your own father at chess or arm-wrestling. I don’t want to go back and find that the carcass has been picked clean. Because I know without a doubt that “Sgt. Pepper’s” changed the course of my life. If the magic is gone, it’s only because first loves can’t be repeated. When I was 8, I’d never heard anything like it, and I can honestly say that if I live to be 100, I’ll never hear anything like it again.

Aimee Mann is a singer and songwriter.

*************************************************************************************

Reading this, all I could think of was 'Star Wars' - how it affected me at the time, and how I feel about it now. Maybe I'll write something about that later on, if you're not completely sick of hearing me prattle on about that movie.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, February 05, 2007

The Long And Litigious Road

VARIETY: Apple, Beatles resolve dispute
Trademark battle comes to an end
By PHIL GALLO
Posted: Mon., Feb. 5, 2007, 9:00am PT

After nearly two decades of discord, the Beatles and Apple computers are singing the same song: "We Can Work It Out."

Apple Corps, the record company the Beatles founded in 1968, and Apple, the Cupertino computer company, reached an accord that gives the latter ownership of the name and the apple logo.

Apple will license certain trademarks back to Apple Corps. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Deal naturally opens the door to make Beatles music -- the holy grail of pop -- available via Apple's online iTunes store. While members of the Beatles have OK'd the sale of solo work, the Beatles catalog has remained offline.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs said in a statement, "It has been painful being at odds with (the Beatles) over these trademarks." The resolution, he said, "should remove the potential of further disagreements."

Jobs had stirred the pot regarding a resolution to the conflict when he used the Beatles' "Sgt. Pepper" album cover and played "Lovely Rita" during the launch of the iPhone.

Now, Beatles fans worldwide may well read further into Jobs statement "Let the downloading begin."

But the Fab Four decisionmakers -- Paul McCartney; Ringo Starr; Yoko Ono, the widow of John Lennon; and the estate of George Harrison -- have been notoriously gun-shy about embracing new technology.

When compact discs were introduced to replace vinyl records, the Beatles were slow to come to the table. EMI, which releases the Beatles recordings, issued the British editions of the albums in blocks beginning in 1987, standardizing the catalog. In 2004, Capitol issued the first four American releases as a box set; last year, it issued the second block of four.

Since the band's breakup in 1970, there have been only about 20 Beatles releases of their recordings from the 1960s; by contrast, RCA and BMG have released more than 200 Elvis Presley packages since his death in 1977.

Evidence of the Beatles' extraordinary power at retail: In 2000, the hits compilation 'Beatles 1" performed so well that it was credited with salvaging the year from disaster.

Agreement replaces a 1991 pact between the two companies and puts an end to the trademark lawsuit Apple Corps filed against Apple in 2003 in London.

The two have had a tenuous relationship over the use of the apple logo in relationship to music commerce.

Apple Corps filed the suit, claiming the Apple iTunes store violated the 1991 deal. A court in London ruled in favor of Apple in May, and Apple Corps' appeal was scheduled to be heard later this month.

During the trial, Apple Corps manager Neil Aspinall disclosed that the catalog was being remastered.

In a statement issued Monday, he said, "The years ahead are going to be very exciting times for us. We ... look forward to many years of peaceful cooperation with (Apple)."

Apple's stock price closed Monday at $83.80, down 81¢.

Labels: , , , , , , ,