Saturday, January 23, 2010

Toy OTD: Rosko Toys Battery-Operated Charley Weaver Bartender (1962)

Older toys based on television personalities tend to look a little creepy. Cartoon characters (being simple to begin with) translated well into toy form, but '60s manufacturing technology just wasn't up to the task of capturing a pleasing, realistic likeness.

Most internet dwellers probably don't remember radio/theater/tv personality Cliff Arquette, aka Charley Weaver - if you're in your mid-forties, chances are you caught the tail end of his career quipping on the '70s version of the Hollywood Squares show. While drinking wasn't as central to his comedy as Foster Brooks or Dean Martin, it was certainly part of his persona. Enough, at least, to inspire this mechanical toy.

What this battery-operated figure lacks in polish, it makes up for in activity. Switch it on, and "Charley" mixes a drink, quaffs it, then scrunches his face (flushing red) as smoke comes out his ears! Mine works pretty well, even after all this time (though I'm not sure the red bulb still lights up). Silly but amusing!

The figure doesn't have a lot of volume, and the head is disproportionately huge in order to accommodate the mechanism. Rosko did make an effort to duplicate Charley's costume, right down to his battered hat (my toy is missing its tie, but is otherwise complete). The complexion of a brand-new model is much closer to its flesh and blood counterpart, as mine has soaked in its share of UV rays.

I'm also impressed with the tin litho bar counter. It's an element that the designer could have easily painted a solid color, leaving Charley to be the centerpiece. Instead, it's decorated with lively textures, 'bar stools', and a reference to Elsie Krack, the ugliest girl in Mount Idy.

The packaging is pretty cool looking, too. While the fonts may be somewhat lackluster, the box was designed to compensate for the toy's visual shortcomings - shoppers got a full-blown illustration of Mr. Weaver behind the bar. It looks more like a model kit box than one for a battery-powered toy!

This isn't a particularly rare toy, but getting one in good shape (and in working order) can be pricey. They seem to range between $125.00 (not working and missing his shaker top) to $350 + shipping (complete and working). There's cheaper examples for sale, so be patient and read the item descriptions carefully. Have fun!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Great New Weird Al Video!

JibJab and Weird Al... two great tastes that taste great together!
Check out their new White-Stripes-esque video here -
Some fun animation and hilarious cutouts!

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, February 15, 2008

Ilinois Dick Tracy Museum Closes

NORTHWEST HERALD: Funding woes foil Dick Tracy museum
By JENN WIANT - jwiant@nwherald.com
Monday, February 04, 2008

WOODSTOCK – The Chester Gould – Dick Tracy Museum, housed in the Old Courthouse building on the Woodstock Square since 1991, will close June 1 for financial reasons.

Jean Gould O’Connell, daughter of “Dick Tracy” comic strip creator and former Woodstock resident Chester Gould, said the museum had been struggling financially.

“It’s been happening slowly for the past couple of years,” she said. “It was much too difficult to get fundraisers going. It was the same few people [who] were called upon to do it. We just found that we couldn’t make a go of it.”

O’Connell is pleased that the museum, which is privately funded, has lasted this long.

“I’ve put my heart and soul into that museum and tried to make it something that Woodstock would be proud of,” she said. “This is a very sad time for us, but we’ve had very many wonderful years there.”

The estimated 300 pieces of memorabilia and art in the museum, most of which had been donated by people all over the country, will be returned to the owners, O’Connell said. Beverly and Cliff Ganschow, owners of the Old Courthouse, said they would like to maintain a small, permanent display of Chester Gould and “Dick Tracy” memorabilia in a room of the building.

Woodstock Mayor Brian Sager was sad to hear about the museum’s closing.

“The Dick Tracy Museum was a wonderful resource for members of the community, as well as the school youth, and certainly it provided a draw for some visitors to our community,” Sager said. “We certainly are going to miss the museum, but we do understand, with respect and appreciation to the family, the decision that they have had to make.”

Fundraising for the Dick Tracy statue being planned for the grassy area outside of the Old Courthouse had been put on hold, O’Connell said.

Kevin Stebbins, who organizes the annual Dick Tracy Days Parade in June, said the festival probably would cease to exist after the museum closed. The parade will no longer be associated with the comic strip character and will become a community parade, Stebbins said. It has been scheduled for a week earlier this year, on Father’s Day.

When he learned Monday that the museum would close, Stebbins said he was “kind of shocked,” but had expected it to happen eventually.

“I know that they’ve had some financial difficulties in the past and they haven’t had very much support in the community,” he said. “... [But] I wasn’t expecting it to happen so soon.”

*************************************************************************************

Crap! I was thinking of trying to go to Dick Tracy Days this year. So much for that... bummer.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Help! Comes to DVD - Widescreen At Last!

Yes, you can finally get Richard Lester's Help! without having to watch it cropped, or needing to own a laserdisc player. The title came out yesterday as a two-disc set, garnished with interviews and documentaries. Sadly, there's no commentary, but it's widescreen, and I'll bet the transfer is a big improvement from the last release! That's exciting, because I think it's a really sharp-looking movie.

I agree with most folks that A Hard Day's Night is a lot better, but Help! is still a lot of fun, even if the Beatles were starting to lose interest in the whole movie-making thing at the time. Directing four guys frequently stoned on pot can't be fun (not to mention having to come up with another story), but I think it turned out pretty well! You can pick it up at Amazon.com for $16.95 + shipping.

PS - After seeing it for the first time, I always wanted to live in the four-house-wide flat that the guys live in at the beginning. Sunken floors are super-cool!

UPDATE: There's a great breakdown of the differences between this DVD release and the previous one at whatgoeson.com. Thanks to Bob Scott for the tip!

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Picture OTD

Image from Geekologie, a funny partner site to The Superficial and I Watch Stuff! I think this says it all, but in case you disagree, click here.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 14, 2007

T-Shirt OTD

'Nuff said! You can buy it for $17.99 (or $19.99 for the larger sizes) + shipping at thinkgeek.com.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 08, 2007

For You Combination Magritte & Star Wars Fans - Both Of You

I didn't do this. I got it from here.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 18, 2007

The Police Prepare For Their Reunion Tour

NY TIMES: They Can Play. Can They Play Nice?
By JON PARELES
Published: February 18, 2007

NORTH VANCOUVER, British Columbia
IN a high-ceilinged studio at the Lions Gate film complex earlier this month, the Police were rehearsing for a very public first gig: opening the Grammy Awards broadcast last Sunday with their 1978 hit “Roxanne” before announcing a world tour the next day. Sting, 55, on bass; Andy Summers, 64, on guitar; and Stewart Copeland, 54, on drums, were working through a list of two dozen songs. For the first time in decades the Police would be back together for more than one night. “I’ve trapped myself back 30 years,” Sting said.

The old Police sound was a lean, nimble, pointillistic approach to syncopation and space that Mr. Summers called “the sound of tension,” and that tension sounded intact as the band kicked into “Message in a Bottle,” with its jumpy guitar riff and stamping beat. Half a minute later Sting waved the song to a stop. “Pick,” he said tersely, his voice slightly irritated. “It doesn’t work.”

Mr. Summers had been playing guitar with a pick, not his fingers as he used to. “You thought for a second that he wouldn’t notice?” Mr. Copeland cackled. Mr. Summers shrugged: “I played it with a pick all day yesterday, and he didn’t say a word.” He abandoned the pick, Mr. Copeland shouted “One! Two! Three! Four!” and in an instant the song was galloping forward again. It was just another moment of readjustment for three headstrong musicians rebuilding a tricky alliance.

Twenty-four years ago the Police ruled the rock world. Their seven-year career had been one unbroken ascent: each album outselling the last, each tour bigger. In 1983 they had claimed the mantle of the Beatles by playing Shea Stadium.

But as all three freely admit, their years as rock stars together were also years of bitter conflict, sometimes to the point of fistfights backstage. “We would be playing arenas and feeling the love pour onto us,” Mr. Copeland said. “And then you would come backstage, to the guys that mattered most, and feel the unlove.” From the beginning they had been three disparate personalities. Mr. Copeland is voluble and extroverted, Sting earnest and pensive, and Mr. Summers looks happiest talking about chord changes and guitar gizmos. What connected them was the music that they fought over most determinedly of all.

“We didn’t go to school together,” Sting said. “We didn’t grow up in the same neighborhood. We were never a tribe. There was friction for the right reasons. We care passionately about the music and we’re all strong characters, and nobody would be pushed around. So it was part of our dynamic. We fought cat and dog over everything.”

Although Mr. Copeland founded and named the Police, Sting quickly emerged both as the band’s voice and its hitmaking songwriter. But the band’s songs were simultaneously taut pop structures and improvisational melees, with Mr. Summers layering on complex chords and guitar effects, while Mr. Copeland’s drumming shattered and precisely reassembled the beat. As the Police worked up Sting’s songs, decisions were often made two against one. Sting grew to feel constrained.

“I wanted no rules, no limitations,” he said. “Bands that stay together have to toe the party line. And I wasn’t willing to do that.” And so, when the band wound up their 1983 stadium tour, Sting struck out on his own. “We were the biggest band in the world, by all intents and purposes,” he said. “And I just thought: ‘Well, this is it. After this everything else is just diminishing returns. I want another challenge. I want to start again.’ ”

In recent years each member has told his part of the Police story. Mr. Copeland made a documentary. Sting and Mr. Summers wrote memoirs. But the recollections are strikingly different.

Sting’s “Broken Music” dispatches the entirety of the Police’s glory years in just two pages. Mr. Summers’s “One Train Later,” by contrast, details an exhilarating whirlwind of tours and ends soon after the band’s breakup, which he calls an “open wound.”

“At the time there was a sort of numbness,” he said at rehearsal. “I don’t think I realized what was happening. I felt like I walked off a cliff and realized. ...” He looked downward, as if into a chasm. “It felt like a limb had been chopped off. It was like being deserted by a lover.”

Since that time Sting has remained a rock star, with multimillion-selling albums and well-publicized causes like rain forests and human rights. Mr. Summers has been leading groups on the jazz circuit, from clubs to festivals. Mr. Copeland established himself as a film composer (for directors including Francis Ford Coppola and Oliver Stone), and was coaxed back to performing by the jam band Oysterhead. No one had any reason to expect a reunion. “For years it was just, forget it,” Mr. Summers said. “Five years passed, 10 years passed.” Sting, in a radio interview, once called the prospect of reviving the Police insane.

And yet here they are: booked for arena concerts worldwide into next year, with some stadium dates on hold, just in case. The tour begins on May 28 in Vancouver and comes to Madison Square Garden on Aug. 1 and 3.

Band members had stayed in touch since 1983, but they only played together on a few brief and uncomfortable occasions. Then last year they all found themselves at the Sundance Film Festival, and later Mr. Copeland and Mr. Summers both attended the Los Angeles stop of Sting’s current tour. He is playing the lute songs of the Renaissance composer John Dowland. Mr. Summers and Mr. Copeland said they had both sensed a change. It was more than they had seen of each other in a long time.

“I was thinking, ’Well, now what do I do?’ ” Sting said in an interview in his hotel room. His lute was leaning against a wall. “Do another lute record? I don’t want to paint myself into that corner. Do I do another Sting record? What’s going to surprise people? What’s going to surprise me? Wow, can I really be thinking that?”

A Police reunion “just seemed right,” he said. “It felt right in the heart. I woke up, and I just had this instinct, just had this desire to call the guys up and say, ‘Let’s give this a go.’ ”

Actually his manager, Kathryn Schenker, made the calls. She sprang the idea on Mr. Summers and Mr. Copeland at a meeting where they expected to discuss plans for reissues of the five Police albums, which will mark the 30th anniversary of the band’s formation in 1977. “They were so shocked it wasn’t funny,” Ms. Schenker recalled. “They were so happy and excited but very, very, very, very surprised.”

The Vancouver rehearsal studio where they eventually reunited was a long way from the Police’s do-it-yourself beginnings in punk-era London. A film crew was on hand to make the inevitable documentary, with bright lights, makeup for the band members and a camera on semicircular tracks rolling around their setup. A caterer served lobster for dinner.

For pre- and post-rehearsal workouts there was a Pilates trainer who brought along with her a machine called, coincidentally, a Group Reformer. A beat-up guitar that Mr. Summers is playing isn’t the one that toured the world with him in the early 1980s; it’s an exact replica made by Fender, copying every nick, chip and scrape as well as the pickups (made by Fender’s rival, Gibson) and custom electronics inside. It’s part of a limited edition of 250 that sold out at $15,000 each — a measure of Mr. Summers’s lasting reputation among musicians and guitar geeks.

For all three band members, reuniting the Police wasn’t just a matter of relearning parts. They were also rebuilding a collaboration that had been as volatile as their music. “After 20 years we’ve all changed shape, and the pieces don’t quite fit together in the same way they used to,” Mr. Copeland said. “With the best of intentions, with the best of attitude, we were wanting to kill each other.”

Since they last worked together, all three had gotten used to being bandleaders and composers. “It would be much easier just to go in the studio and make a record with my band,” Sting said. “And it’s not just the musical stuff. It’s the social stuff, it’s the personal psychology stuff of going back to a marriage, returning to a dysfunctional marriage and making it better, making it work. I really want it to work.”

The Police had already had a few days of rehearsal before allowing a visit from an outside observer, and they had built a wary, joshing camaraderie. Sting, who at first had tried to lead the reunited Police by telling the others what to play, was still taking charge and picking songs to work on. But he was now prefacing his ideas with “I think” and “Perhaps” and “Do you think we might.” He and Mr. Summers hazed Mr. Copeland about wearing a sweatband; in turn Mr. Copeland would punctuate their discussions over abstruse chord substitutions with mock exasperation.

“Somewhere in the beginning of 2008,” Mr. Copeland said, “we’ll be playing the last show of this tour. And I’ve got $10 here that says Sting will suggest another chord for Andy to play.”

“And why not?” Sting said.

During a break Mr. Summers said: “I feel it all coming back, the whole thing. Some of it’s moronic, like wandering around being a rock star, and everybody going, ‘What do you need, what do you need?’ And I’m thinking, ‘Oh, yeah, I remember this.’ But it’s like getting into an old familiar suit. I feel all the old reflexes coming back.”

They were the reflexes of virtuosos determined not to become their own tribute band. “At the moment it’s an exercise in nostalgia, certainly,” Sting said, “but also trying to get something modern and something new out of this situation. That may result in another song. I can’t predict. I’d like that to happen. But we’re just trying to remember the chords at the moment.”

The sound the Police created in their seven years together — light-fingered but assertive, musicianly but unmistakably pop — hasn’t aged as fast as much 1980’s music, and it has been emulated by musicians from Fugazi to Tool to Incubus to John Mayer. “We were the greatest rock band in the world, and that’s the way we want to be,” Mr. Summers said. “And we still have enough ego to think that we can come back, probably just like all bands, and blow every other band out of the water.”

But not yet. “Right now we’re not incredible,” Mr. Copeland said. “We started out like a high school band last week. We got to be like a college band. Yesterday we started to sound like a bar band. Today we sound like, ’O.K., we could earn a living like this.’ But we are not yet playing like we deserve to play in a stadium. We’ll get there, now that we’re on the right track.”

Sting kept working to add subtleties to songs that he has been performing continually through the years. He described “Every Breath You Take” to the band, explaining why he wanted nothing flashy, just a subdued, metronomic beat. “To me it’s like a Bergman movie,” he said. “Nothing happens until two very violent acts. One is the bridge, two is the coda. But not a mouse stirs. It’s like a still life.”

Mr. Copeland interjected, “But there might be a lion, sir.”

“Yeah,” Sting said. “That’s me.”

For the Grammys the Police’s allotted television time would hold a tightly abridged “Roxanne.” A crew member was timing the song. “We’re going for a clean 3 minutes 30,” Sting said.

This “Roxanne” would mix the familiar and the exploratory, announcing both the return of the Police and their determination to be more than an oldies act. “ ’Roxanne’ needs a slightly new dress every night, a slightly different pair of heels to get me excited,” Sting had said earlier.

The first verse and chorus had the old Police attack. Then the middle floated into new, echoey improvisations before the end charged back into the chorus that used to have whole arenas shouting along. Here the big finale was followed by a brief silence and a call from the crew: “3:37.”

“What happens if we go over by seven seconds?” Mr. Summer asked. “Emasculation?”

“They’ll take a Grammy away,” Sting said.

“For each second over, you lose one,” Mr. Summers agreed.

“But that does leave us with another 16 or something,” Sting replied. (He has won 16 Grammys, including five as a member of the Police and one as the songwriter of “Every Breath You Take.”) A second runthrough ran 3:32.

“We only lose half a Grammy,” Sting said.

“We only lose Andy’s Grammy,” Mr. Copeland said. (The Police’s “Behind My Camel,” written by Mr. Summers, was named best rock instrumental in 1981.) Then he changed his mind, looking toward Sting: “Now wait a minute. You’ve got the most Grammys. So we start with Sting’s Grammys.”

“Easy, big guy,” Mr. Summers said.

Battles had been reduced to banter. The Police knew they would have to get along for a year to come. “I used to think that strife and struggle and tension were important in a band,” Mr. Copeland said. “I no longer believe that. And in fact this band has been rescued by our refusal to fall into strife and confrontation.

“When we arrived here in Vancouver, we had big musical problems. And we didn’t resolve them by shouting at each other, by getting angry at each other, by power plays, by any of that stuff. We resolved our musical issues by comity. The music was sick, and we had to use our social bond to get through and try different solutions to the musical problems.

“It sounds cool that angst, sturm and drang, produces music with fire. No. We’re going to get to fire by love. Because we love each other.”

Sting said: “There’s more compromise now. There’s more sense of, just relax and this will be O.K.” He paused. “So far.”

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, February 10, 2007

On Fame And The Audience

NY TIMES: Why Did We Watch? The Answer Isn’t Pretty
By CARYN JAMES
Published: February 10, 2007

Becoming famous is relatively easy: Anna Nicole Smith was born with a beautiful face, a big smile and a voluptuous body she was happy to bare for Playboy. Staying famous for nothing much is hard work, and that is the real story of Ms. Smith’s life and death. Her desperation for fame was so raw that she didn’t mind being the butt of the joke if it helped maintain her place in the spotlight. Her career started out tacky, went downhill from there and ultimately says more about the culture’s fascination with celebrity than it does about Anna Nicole Smith.

While most stars play a clever cat-and-mouse game with the media, Ms. Smith’s sport was Extreme Fame. Her sense of how to court attention was simply to show up, pose and practically say, “Come get me, use me.” In that blatant desire for publicity she embodied the ultimate symbiosis of celebrity: between an individual who acted as if life out of the spotlight were worthless, and a press and public eager to indulge her craving for attention.

But without any actual career to back up her claim on the public, the question becomes: why did we watch? The unsettlingly vapid reason: because we could. She was a glittery spectacle who offered guilt-free voyeurism, as we watched her dramas with drugs and weight and inheritance laws. And the lesson of her fame is that there is no lesson.

All the attempts to justify her fame that have flowed in since her death on Thursday are hollow. She was not Marilyn Monroe; the closest Ms. Smith came to a real movie career was a small role in the spoof “Naked Gun 331/3 : The Final Insult.” She was not a rags-to-riches inspiration; most little girls don’t dream of growing up to be Playmate of the Year, marrying an 89-year-old billionaire and fighting for his money all the way to the Supreme Court. And she was not a cautionary tale; she courted attention too relentlessly to seem innocent or deluded.

There was the ring of truth in what her mother told “Good Morning America” yesterday: that her daughter said, “If my name is out there in the news, good or bad doesn’t matter, good or bad I make money, so I’m going to do whatever it takes.” It says a lot about the bubble Ms. Smith lived in that even her mother, Virgie Arthur, communicated with her daughter through the media. On “Good Morning America,” Ms. Arthur said she had tried to warn her estranged daughter about her drug use, and had done so by appearing on the Nancy Grace show.

Ms. Smith’s lust for fame coincided with a media explosion she could exploit. After her weight ballooned, and her modeling career declined, she latched onto the reality television craze. But her two seasons of “The Anna Nicole Show” on E! revealed how inept she was at shaping an image. Her speech was slurred, her voice was whiny, her manner was demanding, and the curiosity that fed the ratings quickly dissipated. She seemed beyond pathetic by 2004, after she became a diet-product spokeswoman and showed off her newly slim body in another slurry appearance at the American Music Awards.

Her story took an indisputably tragic turn in September, when her 20-year-old son, Daniel, died days after Ms. Smith gave birth to a daughter. Yet even then she couldn’t rise above the lurid nature of her fame. She sold photographs of her son and newborn in the hospital room where he died to In Touch magazine; even now, video of her Caesarean section is available on YouTube.

And soon an ugly paternity battle over the infant broke out in a flurry of media interviews, with two men claiming to be the father: Larry Birkhead, a former boyfriend, and Howard K. Stern, Ms. Smith’s longtime lawyer and confidant. (He seemed glued to her on the reality show.) It’s no surprise that Mr. Stern announced his fatherhood on “Larry King Live,” with Ms. Smith by his side.

The messiness of her death — its unknown cause, the continuing legal battles about the inheritance and the little girl’s paternity — have made its aftermath just as media-centric as her life, with cable news channels trotting out a parade of casual former boyfriends, sometime-friends and estranged relatives.

Donna Hogan, Ms. Smith’s half-sister, talked to Larry King on the phone about her forthcoming book (announced long before Ms. Smith’s death), predictably called “Train Wreck: Anna Nicole Unauthorized.” Ms. Hogan said she hadn’t seen her sister in about a decade.

And while commentators are struggling to find meaning in her life, the responses to her death in the hours just after it was announced may more accurately reflect the public attitude toward her as a joke who drew gawkers rather than fans.

Many reactions seemed to defy the usual courtesy of not speaking ill of the dead. A post by the Web site Wonkette.com said, “the dope-addicted floozy Anna Nicole Smith keeled over dead in a Florida hotel about an hour ago,” a fast turnaround of irreverence even for the Internet. Geraldo Rivera on the Fox News Channel put the blame for Ms. Smith’s sorry life on Mr. Stern, saying, “He’s a pimp,” who sold her to the media. (What does that make her?) And even Larry King, the friendliest of anchors, told Wolf Blitzer that Ms. Smith was “not the smartest person in the world” before praising her good humor and good heart.

The news of her death brought the inevitable jolt that comes when anyone dies suddenly at 39. And there is the inescapable tragedy of a 5-month-old left without her mother. But Anna Nicole Smith’s fame is as sad and shallow in death as it was in life, just as much of a tawdry compact between her and us.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

New Nationwide Insurance Commercial

Okay, I have a little more respect for Kevin Federline now. Check it out!

Thanks to the Superficial for the heads up.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Ladies And Gentlemen, The Blue Parrot

Please welcome Roger Colton's new entertainment/pop culture website, The Blue Parrot! Roger's written lots of articles for Jim Hill Media, and now he's striking out on his own. Keep your eyes peeled for lots of fun posts - especially if you like Disneyland!

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wikio